Timeline Refresh
In 2010, speaking on the IPL controversy involving then Minister of State for External Affairs Shashi Tharoor, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh said that he had to ascertain all the facts after he returned to India before taking any action in the matter. Dr Singh was speaking to journalists at the end of the Nuclear Security Summit hosted by President Barack Obama in Washington. Read the report on rediff.com
"The Congress Vice-President has also written to me on the issue and also made a statement.
"The Government is seized of all these developments. The issues raised will be considered on my return to India after due deliberations in the Cabinet."
However, ever since Rahul Gandhi barged into Ajay Maken's media meet and announced he wanted to tear up the ordinance and throw it away, the PMO has maintained that the PM would respond to Rahul's statement after he returns from the UNGA.
Malini Parthasarathy tweets: While it's odd for Rahul G to steal the PM's moral thunder,why did PM go along with the ordinance to shield politicians, in the first place? With his emphasis on morality and clean politics should never have agreed to this ordinance to protect convicted politicians.
Barkha Dutt: A Top UPA Minister tells me that the PM should go public with the fact that he was implementing a "party decision". A senior minister says the party can "pretend" its the PMs own decision, but the ordinance was a political mandate ordered on Sep 21st.
The Congress Vice President's blunt denunciation of the controversial ordinance that seeks to negate the Supreme Court verdict immediately disqualifying convicted MPs and MLAs as "complete nonsense" happened in New Delhi while the prime minister was sleeping in his suite in the Four Seasons Hotel in Washington DC.
Singh's aides were woken up by the media seeking reaction to Rahul's attack including the comment that the government decision on the ordinance, which is now before President Pranab Mukherjee, was "wrong".
No immediate reaction was forthcoming but PMO sources said that Singh would "deal with the matter" only on his return to New Delhi on Oct 1.
The PM's aides, who were preparing for Singh's meeting with President Barack Obama later in the day, went into a huddle but refrained from making any public comments.
"Rahul ji's opinion is the opinion and the line of Congress... Now Congress party is opposed to this Ordinance.
The views of Congress party should always be supreme," party general secretary and communication department in-charge Ajay Maken said when asked about the fate of the ordinance in the wake of Rahul's views and whether it is likely to be withdrawn.
If you're blissfully unaware of what we are talking about, the Congress vice-president stormed into Congress general secretary Ajay Maken's media meet and said that the ordinance saving tainted netas was 'complete nonsense, it should be torn up and thrown away. It is my personal opinion'.
Earlier in the day, Sonia Gandhi, Rahul and Priyanka are believed to have a meeting on the withdrawal of the Ordinance, as well.
The President is believed to have saved a major constitutional crisis and has given the UPA a much-needed boost by urging Rahul Gandhi to come clean on the ordinance.
The President had felt that the apex court might strike it down and believed he had limited resources to stop the ordinance from being passed. A Union Minister is believed to have said that 'Pranabda saved the UPA Government', soon after Rahul Gandhi's quickie press conference.
Be that as it may, Sonia Gandhi was party to the decision of issuance of the Ordinance on disqualifying convicted elected representatives. It was she who agreed to sidestep the SC order during the all party meeting and also in the Congress Core Committee meeting.
Rahul's dramatic and open denunciation of the ordinance comes a day after President Pranab Mukherjee called three ministers - Home, Law and Parliamentary Affairs - and raised questions over the need for an ordinance on an issue on which there was no political consensus.
Earlier, Shashi Tharoor, the Congress MP from Thiruvananthapuram, tweeted: For those who asked abt my silence on the Ordinance, I replied that I had learned the hard way that speaking out of turn was not OK4Minister.
But now that my party VP has broken ranks, I'm delighted. I'd declined numerous invitations to defend the Ordinance. Let me say: RG is right.
The BJP has also said that the PM must resign.
Minority Affairs Minister K Rahman Khan said the government will offer free or highly subsidized fertility treatment for Parsi couples who want to have a child. Young Parsis will also be offered counseling sessions to encourage them to marry early. Read
Instead, most of the drama was happening outside the courtroom.
Read more
N Srinivasan was today restrained from assuming charge of BCCI President, if elected to the post, by the Supreme Court which allowed the Board to hold its proposed Annual General Meeting scheduled for Sunday.
"He is a young man. He is working for the youth. He has taken a principled stand on the issue. That is good," Chatterjee told PTI.
"All I can say, this is highly belated realisation of what constitutes nonsense and if the Congress party genuinely believes that this is nonsense, then the heads which have produced this nonsense twice in a month before this country... this is the question of governance... then will those heads remain or will those heads roll?," Jaitley said.
He was reacting to the Congress Vice President's statement that the ordinance should be "torn up and thrown away".
Taking a dig at the Nehru-Gandhi family on the matter, he said, "If the heads don't roll, then this is only a grandstanding, a charade... intended to only establish... well the government makes mistakes, rest of the world makes mistakes, but the first family of the Congress doesn't make mistakes." Jaitley termed as "a desperate damage-control exercise" Gandhi's opposition to the ordinance.
"In the last few days, there has been a national revulsion against this ordinance. Let us not forget that the subject matter of allowing the convicted politician to be a part of the legislative bodies has been approved by the UPA cabinet twice-- first as a bill and now as an ordinance," he said.
On both occasions, the Congress party has supported it, he said. "They have not opposed it. So it is not that till today the Congress was unaware of this. And in fact, the Parliament session was extended by a day to enable this to be passed," Jaitley said.
It was only because of the opposition and Parliament that the bill was referred to the standing committee and not approved, he said.
The verdict on RJD chief and former railway minister Lalu Prasad Yadav, in connection with the multi-crore fodder scam is due on September 30. Yadav a key UPA ally and faces loss of membership, if convicted in the fodder scam.
"If Rahul Gandhi has said something, it is not in my knowledge. You have just informed me about it, we will take cognisance of its (his words) and whatever response needs to be given on it, that will be given," Tewari said.
"If you see from legal point of view, it has been often noticed that subordinates courts, whatever decisions they take, superior courts take note of that and most of the times it has been found that superior courts overrule lower court judgements, he said.
"So the judiciary is a structure and according to that structure if a higher court stays a decision by lower court, then the principle of natural justice should be followed," Tewari said in support of the ordinance.
"What is the response on it by our Vice President (Rahul Gandhi), that is not in my cognisance. We will give you any response needed on it," the Minister said.
Ajay Maken, minutes after defending the ordinance, said that what Rahul Gandhi said is the line of the party. Rahul said the ordinance is nonsense and should be torn up and thrown away.
BJP's Arun Jaitley says this is a belated realisation of what the Congress calls nonsense.
The rally was earlier scheduled for October 15, but was postponed as the date was clashing with two religious festivals.
Ajay Maken says Rahul Gandhi's statement is the line taken by the government. So, will the government withdraw the ordinance? Wait and watch.
BJD: Rahul Gandhi has said this out of public pressure. It's too little, too late. There is an element of confusion in the party. It's a political move by the party to save itself from the political ramifications of the ordinance.
The BJD has been against the ordinance from day one.
Ajay Maken says Rahul Gandhi aired the views of the Congress party and the views of the party should be embraced. Rahul's view has embarrassed his own party including the PM.
Maken, who was at the media meet to defend the ordinance says, Congress believes in internal democracy and this is Rahul's view.
Making a surprise brief appearance at a meet-the-press programme of his party's general secretary Ajay Maken at the Press Club in Delhi, he said the ordinance should be "torn up and thrown away". Maken says Rahul's view is the Congress view.
The cabinet recently cleared an ordinance which will circumvent the apex court's landmark July order, when it had struck down a provision in the Representation of the People's Act (RPA), which protected convicted MPs and MLAs from disqualification.
On August 22, the Union Cabinet cleared the proposal to allow convicted lawmakers to retain their membership, till an appeal was pending before a court.
According to the law ministry's proposal, however, a convicted MP or MLA will neither be entitled to vote nor draw salary and allowances.
The Cabinet, on Tuesday, cleared an ordinance to undo the Supreme Court order disqualifying convicted MPs and MLAs. The ordinance has now been referred to the standing committee.
The police say they received a call at around 10 pm about the woman.
She was found naked and unconscious near the upscale Sushant Lok area, with injuries on her body, a swollen lip and bruises on her face.
In her complaint to the police, the woman, who works at a garment factory, said she was returning from work at around 8 pm when a car stopped and she was dragged into it by four or five men inside.
The men allegedly forced her to drink alcohol and after taking her to an isolated spot, took turns to rape her. They finally dumped her on the road.
The AAP also said that it welcomed the SC's decision on the right to negative vote.
Sources say the government is under pressure to withdraw the measure, with the President reportedly "unsure of the compelling reasons" for bringing the ordinance at this time and many Congress leaders coming out publicly against the proposed measure.
The court said the right to reject candidates in elections is part of the fundamental right to freedom of speech and expression given by the Constitution to Indian citizens.
It said that democracy is all about choice and significance of the right of citizens to cast negative voting is massive.
With the concept of negative voting, the voters who are dissatisfied with the candidates in the fray would turn up in large number to express their opinion which would put unscrupulous elements and impersonators out of the polls, it said.
The bench, while reading out the operative portion of the judgement, did not throw light on a situation in case the votes cast under no option head outnumber the votes got by the candidates.
In all 12 people, including the three militants, were killed. Just a day before the twin strike, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh said he would meet his Pakistan counterpart Nawaz Sharif on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly over the weekend.
The leaders of the nuclear-armed neighbours are expected to discuss rising violence in Kashmir. Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah said the assault was an attempt to derail the talks.
BJP's Balbir Punj says the party welcomes the move of negative voting and would strengthen democracy.
As of now, there is no provision yet to count the "rejection" votes and so these will not impact the result of the election.
Activists have proposed that if more than 50 per cent of those who vote reject all candidates, there should be a re-election in that constituency. -- NDTV
In the present system, if the person wants to register a negative vote, the voter will have to inform the polling officer at the booth and register a written protest. This, said the Supreme Court does not allow the voter to exercise his fundamental right to secrecy while voting.
Pronouncing the judgment, Chief Justice Sathasivam said the mechanism of negative voting is necessary and a vibrant part of democracy.
This is a landmark judgment and is bound to have plenty of political implications.
India votes in the Lok Sabha polls in 2014.
The SC has also asked the EC to maintain secrecy while a negative vote is being cast.
The SC arrived at the decision after hearing a petition filed by the [People's Union for Civil Liberties & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr., WP (c) no. 161/2004] seeking, the right of negative voting.
The petition has sought directions to be issued to the Election Commission to make appropriate provisions in the Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) and ballot papers so as to enable the voters to exercise their right of negative voting and also ensure that the exercise of this right is kept secret.
The BSE benchmark Sensex today rose over 87 points in early trade on the back of increased buying by participants amid a mixed trend on other Asian bourses and further strength in the rupee.
The 30-share index gained 87.72 points, or 0.44 per cent, to trade at 19,981.57, with all the sectoral indices led by consumer durables and oil and gas rising up to 1.27 per cent. Sensex had gained 37.61 points yesterday. The wide-based National Stock Exchange index Nifty rose 23.30 points, or 0.40 per cent, to trade higher at 5,905.55.
Brokers said pick up in buying by funds and retail investors, tracking a mixed trend on other Asian bourses, following overnight gains in the US markets on better-than-forecast jobless claims, supported the trading sentiment here. Besides, further rise in the rupee to 61.86 against the dollar also triggered buying activity, they said.
In Asia, Hong Kong's Hang Seng index was up 0.08 per cent, while Japan's Nikkei lost 0.16 per cent in early trade. The US Dow Jones Industrial Average ended 0.36 per cent higher yesterday.
The UN Security Council has discussed a draft resolution on ridding Syria of chemical weapons after the US and Russia agreed the text. The vote in the 15-member Council could now take place later on Friday, diplomats at the UN in New York said.
The agreement breaks a two-and-a-half year deadlock in the UN over Syria. It is seen as a key step in a US-Russia brokered plan earlier this month under which Syria agreed to disclose its arsenal and eliminate it by mid-2014.
What is the need for dialogue with Pak: Modi at Trichy rally
Dhoni, Raina blast Chennai to victory over Sunrisers
Rupee hits 1-week high as foreign banks sell dollars
Coal scam: CBI questions Naveen Jindal
Ishrat case: CBI seeks legal opinion on tapped conversations
Muzaffarnagar violence: SC seeks explanation from UP