The court held that Raja's deposition matched with the official record and appeared to be cogent, truthful and acceptable.
It was a matter of great importance that he took a 'huge risk' in appearing as a defence witness, giving a good opportunity to the prosecution to 'grill him' in detail about the payment of alleged illegal gratification of Rs 200 crore, Special Judge O P Saini said in his verdict.
Saini, who 'religiously' heard the matter on a daily basis for nearly seven years, said the genesis of the case lAY not so much in the actions of Raja but in the action or inaction of others.
"There is no material on record to show that Raja was mother lode of conspiracy in the instant case. There is also no evidence of his no holds barred immersion in any wrongdoing, conspiracy or corruption," the court said.
The judge said it was clear that complete facts were not placed before the then prime minister by his own office for which Raja could not be faulted and senior officials at the PMO had 'suppressed the most relevant and controversial part' of Raja's letter.
The CBI had alleged that Raja had misled Singh in his letters on several key issues related to the policy of grant of 2G spectrum licences, including first-come-first-served and the cut-off date. -- PTI
Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance (INDIA) partners Samajwadi Party and Congress on Wednesday announced a tie-up for the Lok Sabha polls in Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh, with UP's main opposition party leaving 17 out of...
Police investigating the suspected suicide of model Tania Singh will send a notice to cricketer Abhishek Sharma as the preliminary probe revealed the duo was friends and she had sent him a message on WhatsApp chat which was not responded...