Why Girish Karnad isnt wrong about V.S. Naipaul
November 05, 2012 13:02
Once the word got around that Girish Karnad had evisceratedVidiadhar Surajprasad Naipaul, the Trinidad-born British writer who had been given the lifetime achievement award at the Tata Literature Live! Festival in Mumbai, the battle-lines were drawn clearly.
Karnad had to be wrong because Naipaul was great and his critics were insignificant (he is a lion and people like me are "rats', as someone on Twitter described me, when I defended Karnad, although Naipaul would have shown off his wider vocabulary, and called his critics "pygmies' or something suitably outrageous). More
Karnad had to be wrong because Naipaul was great and his critics were insignificant (he is a lion and people like me are "rats', as someone on Twitter described me, when I defended Karnad, although Naipaul would have shown off his wider vocabulary, and called his critics "pygmies' or something suitably outrageous). More