More armed police are to be deployed in London after the Paris attacks, but the move is unlikely to herald a shift toward providing weapons to most officers in the largely unarmed British force, experts said.


Britain is proud of being one of few countries where police usually do not carry guns, and the sight of heavily armed counter-terrorism police officers in recent days is highly unusual one for many people.


While the image abroad of "bobbies on the beat" wearing tall hats and carrying little more than a truncheon and handcuffs is outdated, currently only 2,000 of the capital's 32,000 officers are armed.


However, coordinated gun and bomb attacks in Paris last Friday, as well as a review of British police budgets next week, have prompted a partial rethink.


"There will be more firearms officers available every day on the streets," London's Metropolitan Police Commissioner Bernard Hogan-Howe told LBC radio this week.


"What we don't want to do is to knee-jerk towards a new type of policing where everybody's armed," he added. British police are proud of their history of policing "by consent" -- the idea that police serve the people, not the state. They say the principle would be tarnished by the sight of too many armed police officers. Also, the kind of crimes that would necessitate an armed response are relatively low in Britain, and too many armed police could spur more criminals into buying guns, experts say. "We are an unarmed force. We're proud of that. There are only probably four forces in the world that are unarmed, despite this huge city, despite this huge country," Hogan-Howe said.



Britain's Prime Minister David Cameron with police officers after laying a wreath at the memorial to victims of the July 7, 2005 London bombings, in Hyde Park, central London. Photograph: Peter Nicholls/ Reuters