Pronouncement concludes. The three-judge bench of the Supreme Court will decide the title dispute. No reference to larger Bench, the Supreme Court says in a 2:1 majority. Justice Nazeer's was the only dissenting voice. Justice Ashok Bhushan on behalf of CJI Dipak Misra said that all places of worship equal and are libale to be acquired. There can be no exception to the 1994 judgment. The 1994 Ismail Faruqui judgment was only in relation to land acquisition and is not applicable to the Ayodhya case.